Former property owner can bring action for
nuisance
Vance v. XXXL Development, LLC, --- P.3d ----, 2009 WL 1202596 (Wash.App.
Div. 2 May 05, 2009) (NO. 37503-6-II)
In 1988, Vance bought a house in Longview, Washington for
$205,000. In 2006, XXXL sought approval for a residential
development just to the north of Vance's property. It constructed a
retaining wall two feet from Vance's property line. The concrete
block wall is approximately 25 feet high and more than 100 feet
long.
In December 2006, Vance sued XXXL on several claims, including
private nuisance. The trial court initially set the case for trial
in December 2007, on a date when Vance still owned the home. The
trial court granted XXXL's motion to continue the trial date and
moved the trial to February 2008. Vance sold her home for $185,000
in December 2007, after the original trial date had passed. She
claimed that, absent the nuisance, her house would have been worth
$285,000.
A nuisance is an unreasonable interference with another's use and
enjoyment of property. RCW 7.48.010 provides:
[W]hatever is injurious to health or indecent or offensive to the
senses, or an obstruction to the free use of property, so as to
essentially interfere with the comfortable enjoyment of the life and
property, is a nuisance and the subject of an action for damages and
other and further relief.
RCW 7.48.020 states in part:
Such action may be brought by any person whose property is ...
injuriously affected or whose personal enjoyment is lessened by the
nuisance.” (Emphases added.) And RCW 7.48.180 provides, “The
abatement of a nuisance does not prejudice the right of any person
to recover damages for its past existence.
The measure of damages for nuisance is the diminution in a
property's value due to the nuisance. This method of calculating
damages is not affected by the sale of a property; in fact, the
damages are perhaps more easily measured post-sale.
The court held that the fact that Vance sold the house has no
bearing on her ability to maintain her nuisance suit.