Exorbitant Cost of Commercial Arbitration
Kam-Ko Bio-Pharm Trading
Co. Ltd-Australasia v. Mayne Pharma (USA) Inc.,--- F.3d ----,
(C.A.9 (Wash.))
Business people have been misinformed about
arbitration. Most have been told that it is cheaper than litigation
in court. Except in a few limited cases, it is much more expensive
because the lawyers do the same work as in court and the arbitrators
need to be paid. This case highlights the problem.
The contract between plaintiff and defendant
required arbitration before the International Chamber of Commerce
(ICC). The plaintiff was shocked to discover ICC required a $220,000
advance arbitration fee. It sued asking the court to declare the
arbitration void because the fee was so high as to be substantively
unconscionable under the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA), 9 U.S.C. §§
1-16, and Washington law.
The district court rejected plaintiff’s
argument. The Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed since the contract
was in a commercial context.
In a consumer or employment contract setting,
the outcome would be different.